The project was split into three discrete work packages in order to better define the requirements of the project, and to create distinct deliverables. In addition to defining these work packages, one group member was also assigned to lead each package.

 

Work Package 1 

Research of current products, markets, and designs, including a survey into consumer interests and expectations.

 

Work Package 2

Detailed technical engineering design of a fully functional folding bicycle with a view to manufacture.

Work Package 3

Manufacturing and fabrication of a prototype model in accordance with the design developed in Work Package 2

 

One of the key factors in effectively managing the group dynamic, was to assess and exploit the availability of the team’s collective resources. It was also imperative that the group was aware of the requirements and availability of the technicians and workshop mechanics, so as to make full use of their experience and expertise.

 

To this end, a meeting was arranged with the Senior Lab Technician Chris Cameron to discuss the scope of the project and the resources available to guarantee its completion. This was a particularly useful discussion as it set deadlines for submitting technical drawings to the workshop, as well as providing a better understanding of what level of detail was required.

 

Local support was also sought from a Glasgow bicycle shop called Bike Station, who sponsored SynopTech throughout the project. Their key resources included an understanding of the technical and historical aspects of folding bicycles, but most importantly a skilled team of bicycle maintenance technicians who were available to provide assistance with the drive train installation and discounted part procurement.

 

Finally, the personal skills and resources associated with each individual group member were carefully considered when assigning roles and responsibilities. For example, one group member who studied Mechanical Engineering with Finance was offered the position of Chief Financial Officer. This role required fiscal and financial decisions to be made, predominantly near the start of the project, such as procurement of materials and sponsorship. Conversely, one of the more practical group members was tasked with leading the manufacturing work package. This decision was made as the manufacturing role required someone with proficient hands-on skills. In this way, the availability of resources to the group was carefully considered and managed in order to optimise and exploit the available assets.

 

In addition, a thorough risk assessment was conducted prior to the commencement of the project in an attempt to identify both major and minor risks. Identification of risks allowed mitigation steps to be implemented to minimise their likelihood or consequence.

 

This project was conducted over a period of six months from the 1/10/2015 to the 18/03/2016. In this time, one of the major considerations was the academic deadlines for project submission, by which The Commuter prototype had to be completed. This was the driving deadline for the second semester, around which all other tasks were organised.